Service Detail
Court-admissible technical opinions for civil and criminal proceedings involving cybersecurity incidents.
Martin Vigo holds an official Perito Judicial designation in Spain, registered and numbered by the competent authority. Expert opinions are procedurally compliant and court-admissible in both civil and criminal proceedings.
Judicial reporting requires more than technical skill. It requires procedural compliance, independence and the ability to translate complex cybersecurity evidence into language courts and legal teams can use.
As an officially registered Perito Judicial in Spain, reports are structured to be court-admissible, evidence-traceable and defensible under cross-examination in both civil and criminal proceedings.
Technical rigour translated into admissible, defensible legal narrative
Building a case involving a cybersecurity incident, data breach or digital fraud and need an independent expert who can produce a procedurally valid report and testify under questioning.
You have suffered a breach, ransomware attack or digital fraud and need an independent technical opinion to support insurance claims, regulatory notifications or litigation.
You require a court-appointed technical expert with documented credentials, research background and the ability to explain complex cybersecurity matters in plain legal language.
Causality analysis, liability attribution and regulatory notification support
BEC, phishing, transaction abuse, impersonation and criminal matters
Technical accountability, insurance disputes and contractual breach assessments
Findings, causality analysis and technical conclusions with plain-language interpretation for courts and legal teams.
Detailed evidence references, forensic timelines and methodology notes for traceability and adversarial scrutiny.
1
Clarify legal questions, technical scope and evidentiary constraints with counsel.
2
Assess logs, timelines, controls and technical artefacts for objective, defensible findings.
3
Produce structured conclusions aligned with Spanish and EU procedural requirements.
4
Technical clarification under legal questioning in court or arbitration when required.
Technical analysis of breach mechanics, security control failure and timeline reconstruction for disputes, insurance claims or criminal proceedings.
Independent examination of compromise scenarios, authentication abuse and technical evidence relevant to contested events and criminal matters.
Structured support for legal teams that need a defensible, impartial explanation of complex technical facts for courts and opposing counsel.
Send a brief case summary and we’ll confirm scope, timeline and availability — usually within 24 hours.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Cargo en la empresa
